Someone in my online book group suggested rereading The Little Prince as an adult. So I did, this morning. It was sweet. I received no important adult message, It was just fun to read the story again.
June 2026
This is the 25th anniversary of the book Ishmael, Daniel Quinn’s 1992 philosophical novel. I decided to read it, never having done so before. It is a Socratic dialogue between an unnamed narrator, the pupil, and a highly intelligent, telepathic captive gorilla named Ishmael, the teacher.
The book critiques modern civilization, arguing that humanity's belief in its own supremacy and destiny is a cultural myth driving the planet toward ecological catastrophe.
The book is structured around a few foundational concepts:
Takers vs. Leavers: Ishmael divides human culture into two distinct groups. Takers represent modern, industrialized civilization. They believe humans are the pinnacle of creation, own the world, and are destined to conquer and control it — a worldview born from the Agricultural Revolution. Leavers represent indigenous, tribal cultures. They live within the limits of the natural ecosystem, viewing themselves as part of the community of life rather than its masters.
The Mother Culture: Ishmael challenges his pupils to recognize the stories and assumptions that modern society blindly accepts, creating our cultures.
The Law of Life: Ishmael argues that humans, like all other species, are bound by natural laws. The core rule is simple: you may compete for resources, but you cannot wipe out your competitors or destroy the environment that sustains you. By attempting to "exempt" ourselves from this law, Taker culture has made itself captive to a destructive system.
A philosophical book, yes, but it also has spiritual undertones as well as direct addressing of mythology, ecosystems, sustainability, the importance of diversity, the purpose of humanity, and the role of the human on the planet.
I found it quite intriguing, but not all of you will. Aside from the journey that is a human talking with and learning from a gorilla, it reads more like a nonfiction book than fiction. It does, however, make you think. I recommend only with a grain of salt ... you must be in the right, receptive mind space to enjoy this book.
"With man gone, will there be hope for gorilla?"
June 2026
We were at Beverly Beach State Park and there was a woman sitting in one square foot of sunlight at the end of her campsite, partially on the camp road, reading. She had one square foot more sun than we had at our campsite, which was 100% completely covered with tree canopy. I stopped and spoke with her on my way to the beach, and then again on the way back. She was reading a book by Ann Cleeves. Turns out the first book in the series she was reading was Raven Black. I decided to check her out.
The book was kinda fun, but the primary character, Inspector Jimmy Perez, did nothing for me. No real defining personality traits. He is not Armand Gamache (Louise Penny). I don't think I will read any more of her. I am looking for another mystery series now. Not Louise Penny nor Robert Parker nor Patricia Cornwall nor Nevada Barr nor Dan Brown nor John Grisham. Looking for something set in the US or Canada. Do you have a suggestion?
June 2026
This book has a lot of sex in it but not love.
Flesh follows the life of its protagonist, István, from his difficult adolescence in post-communist Hungary to his rise and fall in the elite circles of London. The story traces István’s journey as he navigates a world where his capacity for violence becomes his primary asset — first as a soldier in Iraq, then as a bodyguard and driver for the super-rich, and finally as a wealthy property developer. A sweeping, decades-spanning novel, István eventually returns to his hometown in Hungary.
80% of the words that come out of his mouth are, quite literally, "okay." He says "okay" to proposals, to ideas, to suggestions, to sex, and as a constant response to "how are you?" He has no color, no personality, no insight, no depth, no self-awareness. He must be the most boring character I have ever encountered.
The story didn't make a lot of sense to me. István, after his stints in detention and the army, works as a bouncer, a bodyguard, and a driver. Then, suddenly, a few years pass and he is married, has a son, is somewhat articulate, and has become a successful business property developer. I do not know how he went from menial, physical jobs to this professional role. Even after rereading it.
I also cannot wrap my head around why Marian recommended this book for book club. It doesn't seem like something we would like, and, more important, I cannot imagine Marian reading Flesh and liking it.
I don't like the character, the story line is confusing, and nothing has grabbed my attention. I do not recommend Flesh.
June 2026
Josie, I don’t know how you do it. You always unearth not-well-known long books from a few years ago, and they are always stellar, such as this one, The Fountains of Silence by Ruta Sepetys.
This is a sweeping, beautifully written historical novel about a time in history you may not know much about, 40 years, beginning in 1939, of leadership under Generalisimo Francisco Franco in Spain. Franco was an oppressive, authoritarian leader, a dictator, a fascist, a cruel leader who cared more about himself than his people. The Fountains of Silence is about what Franco does to attract US investment, hoping to fund his government. He turns old buildings into beautiful structures, and encourages complete support for the oil tycoons, journalists, professors, financial managers and others who want to explore how Spain can serve their business development.
Our main character is Daniel Matheson, who is visiting Madrid with his oil business owner father and Dallas, Texas socialite mother, for much of the summer of 1957. Ana is a worker in the hotel, who must obey rules the management insists upon, such as not talking shout their own personal lives, and never being with a resident unless fulfilling a specific request. Daniel falls in love with Ana Torres Moreno, but that definitely breaks all the rules.
We follow their relationship as Ana shows Daniel some of the wonders of Madrid. He also becomes friends with her sister Julia and brother Rafa, and Julia’s baby. There are interesting sub-plots. These criss-crossing threads keep me engaged in the book. It is an easy read. Took me just over two days.
A major sub-plot is that Daniel’s father wants Daniel to assume leadership of his oil business in Dallas but Daniel wants to be a photojournalist. He meets Ben, who works at a major magazine and encourages and mentors Daniel in his photojournalist efforts.
And there is Fuga, who wants to crawl his way out of poverty by becoming a bullfighter.
And why are there empty caskets in the pile of infant coffins that came from the orphanage Insula, who specializes in the adoption of young children.?
And who is sending Ana threatening notes and, for heaven’s sake, why?
I really enjoyed Fountains of Silence, I learned a great deal about Spain, and also explored family dynamics, love, mystery, resistance to social change, career decisions, cultural clashes on minor issues, such as what shoes are important to wear to a particular event, the role of adoption during a post civil war occurrence, and hidden truths. My most important learning is the one the author seemed to want for us … to explore the silences we all keep; the value of silence; the debilitating aspects of silence; the release of silence; the necessity of being silent no more.
I completely recommend The Fountains of Silence.
June 2026
The White Hot is a bizarre, absurd novel (novella?). How did it make its way to my To Be Read list? Did one of you suggest it?
April!, 26. leaves her daughter Noelle on Noelle's 18th birthday, for ten days. She takes a bus from Philadelphia to Pittsburgh, carrying not a thing with her. April spends four days and nights in Ohiopyle State Park, and then meets a man named Kamal. Kamel takes her to his home, which has no furniture, and introduces her to Charles Mangus. Do you know Mangus? He died in 1979 and bears the moniker "The angriest jazz musician of all time." I played some of his music. It is nothing short of angry, depressing, and defeating. She spends a few days with him, basically wrecking his few belongings, and soon returns home again. She had gone in search of the white hot spot .... the part of her that is overflowing with anger, regret, explosiveness, failure, and pain. I think she heals this spot somewhat.
It is an outrageous, odd, depressing novel. I definitely un-recommend it.
June 2026
I don’t know, I just couldn’t quite enjoy this book. The plot is wonderfully inventive. This is the story of March, who is the father of Louisa May Alcott’s four little women, Meg, Jo, Amy, and Beth. The storyline takes place in two venues/timelines, one when March is 39 and leaves his young women and his wife Marmee at home in Concord, Massachusetts. He signs up for the Civil War as an idealist, a vegetarian, an abolitionist, an anti-slavery and pro-freedom revolutionary, and a chaplain. The other story is about 20 years earlier when he meets and marries Marmee and begins to have daughters. It is perhaps the plot itself, as creative as it is, that sours the book for me. Having read Little Women decades ago, I love the chapters where March is home with his family.
I find the chapters that tell the story of the Civil War to be boring, horror filled, brutal, barbaric, grim, sad, powerful, and violent, coupled with March’s debilitating inability to be a chaplain neither he nor his charges can be proud of. Though, when he begins to teach young black children their letters, he finds his purpose and comes into his own.
Brooks is, of course, a magnificent writer. Perhaps I am simply done with stories about past wars, at least for a while.
I can recommend this book to lovers of Geraldine Brooks. It is another one of her many masterpieces. Enjoy March. If you read it and love it, I would be pleased to read your review of it.
June 2026
How to Read a Book started out with interesting characters and plot. We have three major characters. Violet, our narrator, is 22 and was just released from prison, where she served about 1.5 years for driving drunk and killing a woman who was driving in the opposite direction. Harriet is the volunteer who led a Book Club in the women's prison, two hours a week, for women who were interested in reading together, including Violet. Violet happens upon Harriet in “the Outs” when she begins to live again in the real world in Portland, Maine. Frank is a handyman who does odd jobs for Harriet, and is the husband of Lorraine, the woman who was killed by Violet.
While Wood develops each of these characters well, she does not quite take advantage of the relationships they could have together. Especially, she does not develop Violet and Frank's relationship very well. This is a missed opportunity, I believe.
Yet, the first two-thirds of the story is engaging, especially when Violet takes a job working with three African grey parrots.
I'm the last third, everyone turns romantic and falls in love with someone or another. I found this rather irritating ... like a romance novel plopped itself into the novel.
But the end comes around and redeems the novel.
It is a fun, light read, especially given the topic. You may enjoy it, or you may not. I would not suggest you urgently run out and buy it.
June 2026
I belong to a Facebook group, Book Club Favorites. (Unfollowed two other groups. Book readers are extremely prolific!
Anyway, over the last few months, Theo of Golden received an unbelievable number of posts and incited a plethora of discussion.
"You must read this book. I loved it!”
"I fell asleep reading it. Boring."
"An inspirational book about kindness."
"Too spiritual."
'I don't need a feel-good book to tell me to be kind."
"Might be my favorite book of all time."
"Way over-hyped."
"Loosely disguised Jesus figure."
I was curious to see where I would land. There was very little middle ground. Readers loved it or hated it.
Virtually everyone wrote about the story, and no one wrote about the writing. I will change that direction with my review.
Theo is a well-traveled, wealthy man of 86 who decides to move south from New York City for a year or so. He moves to Golden, Georgia, and meets and befriends many people in this small Southern town. On one of his first days, he enters The Chalice ... a coffee shop that makes European coffee just the way he likes it. On the walls of The Chalice are 92 penciled and pen&ink portraits, created by a local artist. We learn about how Theo buys each portrait, one at a time, and gives it to the person in the portrait, nearly always inspiring deep conversation. Theo is generous, kind, compassionate, and a superb listener.
That is the story line, and it is an interesting one.
Unfortunately, I felt the writing was awful. I don't know if Allen Levi did this on purpose, but it wrecked the book for me. The character of Theo is one-dimensional, tracing paper thin in character development, sophomoric, shallow. There is no depth, no texture, no nuance in his personality. Much as I love debut novels, I will not be looking forward to his second book.
And the ending is contrived, all too convenient. Writing a letter to close up all the loose ends the author didn’t manage to do in the plot line is also a sign of an unsophisticated author.
I cannot think of a single person I would recommend read Theo of Golden. Therefore, by definition, this book receives two hearts.
June 2026
In Chapter one, a Mexican family in Acapulco is celebrating a quinceañera at a backyard barbecue at Sebastian and Lydia's home. In the first five pages of American Dirt, sixteen members of one family are murdered by a drug cartel. Sebastian, who is managing the barbecue at his home, is a journalist who reports the truth about the drugs cartels that have overrun Acapulco. Only his wife Lydia and their son Luca survive the bloodbath, as they were in the house.
This dramatic novel proceeds from there as we follow Lydia and eight-year-old Luca attempt to find safety, knowing they are being tracked by el jefe of the cartel. We are with them as they make the long journey, traveling all the way up Mexico to reach el Norte. They travel much of the time on the roofs of la bestia, which is a freight train. They constantly are on the alert for, and numerous times encounter, police, cartel members, law enforcement agents, ICE agents, border patrol. And yet, they travel as immigrants and find many people along the in small towns who help them with food and water, and occasionally a place to sleep.
This is all complicated by a friend Lydia made before the day of the killings. Javier met her in the bookstore she owns in Acapulco. As their friendship deepens, we learn that Javier is a jefe in the largest, most powerful cartel. He was responsible for the deaths of Lydia's family. He tracks Lydia and Luca as they attempt to find safety,
The writing is very clean, there is considerable suspense, and we get a view of life through a migrant's eyes,
Many literary reviewers panned the book for its lack of authenticity, arguing it capitalized on the suffering of migrants without demonstrating a genuine, nuanced understanding of Mexican culture or the sociopolitical landscape. Ms. Cummins is a white woman of Puerto Rican descent. Not knowing about this criticism, I took American Dirt at face value and found it to be well worth my time. I did learn a lot about the courage and commitment it takes to arrive at our Southern border. I did also think it bogged down a bit in places, because the (literal) landscape never changes.
Besides our main characters, Lydia and her son Luca, we meet others traveling the same path. Soledad and Rebeca are teenage sisters. Their interaction and reaction to the travel is enlightening, often heartwarming. Lydia takes them under her wing, and these four travel together for many miles and many days.
I recommend American Dirt. It is an engaging and powerful read.
May 2026